Commercial Law case study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

Commercial Law - Case Study ExampleIt did non lead Rein AJ to disbelieve the general veracity of the plaintiff.(c) The defendant in his affidavit give tongue to nothing about having received an offer from the plaintiff for $150,000 (the plaintiff on his evidence make no such offer in the telephone conversation). It was not put to the plaintiff that he had made an offer to the defendant or that the defendant had jilted it. The defendant swore in the witness box however that it had been said in an answer in cross examination. Given that that was his explanation for why the plaintiff was not entitled as highest bidder, Rein AJ found his failure to refer to it in his affidavit surprising and his evidence on this point difficult to accept.(d) The plaintiff said that when he spoke to the defendant, the defendant told him that the Wirraway had a current airworthiness certificate. The defendant when cross examined on this said that the airworthiness certificate had expired in July 2006. He said he did not recall if he told the plaintiff that there was a current airworthiness certificate.(e) The defendants version of events, which involved him saying that he would not agree to sell the aircraft unless the emptor inspected it, is not credible and particularly so since he listed the aircraft on eBay for sale without any indication that the buyer should inspect first.(f) Further the defendant had also listed the Wirraway on the Buy now section of eBay for $275,000, and claimed that had anyone clicked on that he would not have sold if the Wirraway had not been inspected (T40-T41), which further diminished his credibility.(g) The defendant himself had purchased many items (including Vintage gondola parts) on eBay and knew that he was entitled to the items when he had been the highest bidder, and Rein AJ found his assertion that he did not understand that he was committed to sell as jolly surprising.Question 5The defendant argued there was no binding and enforceable ag reement, what were the components of this argument (4 marks)The defendant accepted that both he and the plaintiff accepted, by clicking on an accept button, the terms and conditions of eBay but the defendants argument was that there was no binding and enforceable agreement as between the plaintiff and the defendant. To support his contention